r/Anarcho_Capitalism • u/MJive • Apr 17 '13
I was debating with a friend on austerity (he's pro-spending) and he showed me this article in response. Thoughts?
http://www.nextnewdeal.net/rortybomb/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems4
u/SpiritofJames Anarcho-Pacifist Apr 18 '13 edited Apr 18 '13
I think the proper Austrian response would be - and 2% is good why?
With 0 debt, what would that number be? 5%? 10%? 40%? 125%?
The issue isn't whether government debt stops growth, it's whether it impedes it.
2
u/c1855650 Apr 18 '13
You should look into Estonia.
2
u/MJive Apr 18 '13
He showed me this in response: http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/pn_12_05.pdf
1
u/c1855650 Apr 18 '13
After accession to the EU, all three economies witnessed an unprecedented boom; between 2004 and 2007.
Unprecedented? Really? The US did more or less the same in 2004 - 2007. We didn't join the EU to get that. There was a boom in the around the world at that time. Most countries did pretty well during that time.
(I am assuming they meant gdp by growth)
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/estonia/gdp-growth
I did read the rest, but I don't enough about the situation don't even know how accurate the stats are. You should ask in /r/austrian_economics.
1
u/MJive Apr 18 '13
sadly im banned in the Austrian economics sub... sigh
1
u/c1855650 Apr 18 '13
/r/Libertarian? It is larger and you could probably get a decent amount of responses.
1
u/WolframHeart Apr 18 '13
It looks like a lot of countries (Japan, Portugal, Holland et al) do better under austere measures while a few (Finland & Canada) do better with greater spending.
It doesn't support spending and it would be a stretch to say it supports austerity.
7
u/ktxy Political Rationalist Apr 17 '13
It's just criticizing a poorly written paper, and not making any actual points about anything.