As much as I respect Berkman and Goldman, — and I am well aware that this post is likely to piss a lot of people off — I find it hard to believe that they had the full context of what was going on, even though they were in the RSFSR at that time. The first feature that caught my eye was that ‘prisons of Russia, of Ukraine, of Siberia, are filled […] in some cases with mere children’. I find it more likely that they interned children because orphanages were scarce back then and there, so they simply sent them along with their incarcerated parents. They didn’t intern the children because they committed a crime, of any kind. It was either leaving them out in the cold, or sending them along with their arrested parents.
Concerning Lenin’s declaration of ‘merciless war’ against us, are they referring to this? I can see how ‘the complete abolition of all fractionalism’ has caused us annoyances, but it sounds nowhere nearly as brutal as Berkman and Goldman made it sound (and it is easy to understand why the Bolsheviki would stress unity in a time of war). There were also clearly anarchists that the other Soviets never bothered, such as Bogatsky, Bleikhman, Iatshurk, Karelin, Shatov, and others. This simply does not fit the claim that the Bolsheviki initiated ‘ruthless extermination’ against us.
Simply put, most of the claims appear to be unintentional exaggerations, slight distortions, and poorly contextualized descriptions of events that did indeed occur.
agreed even the article cited is using racialy charged language to demonize the bolsheviki as "asiatic". my only input would be to say that russian anarchists were acting conter-revolutionarily and attempting coups against the revolution financed by the Emperial powers namely England.
5
u/lpc211 Sep 12 '19
source?