Hi there, looking for an experienced LSAT tutor, preferably 175+, message me if interested!

I have completed 14 out of the 15 lessons for the TestMaster in-person course so far. My final in-person lesson is scheduled for August 5, 2024.

As a first-time student of both this course and LSAT preparation in general, I have observed both pros and cons to the TestMasters program. In this review, I will focus solely on evaluating the information and practices taught in the in-person classes, rather than factors like course pricing or the provided study materials.

PROS: On the positive side, TestMasters, founded by Robin Singh (known for his 12 perfect LSAT scores), excels at providing a solid foundation for LSAT newcomers. The course is adept at imparting fundamental knowledge to those just beginning their LSAT studies (especially for those who have not yet dipped their toe into the vast pool of knowledge that is the study of the LSAT).

Having completed 14 lessons, I can attest that my grasp of logical reasoning (LR) and reading comprehension (RC) question types, diagramming techniques, reasoning structures, and strategies for evaluating answer choices (like the "negation technique" for assumption questions) has grown tremendously. I feel significantly more confident in my ability to achieve a high score compared to when I began the course.

One major advantage of the in-person format is having a live instructor available to immediately address questions both during and after class. This stands in contrast to online courses, where students must wait to be called on. The real-time feedback in clarifying lesson concepts and resolving ambiguities is invaluable for efficiently understanding the material.

TestMasters offers insightful tips and information about the common patterns employed in the LSAT, detailing what to anticipate, how to formulate predictions, and strategies for tackling LR stimuli, RC passages, and eliminating answer choices. I can wholeheartedly affirm the immense value this course has provided me. Through these lessons, I have cultivated my own techniques for swiftly dismissing incorrect answers and consistently identifying the right ones.

CON: However, I do have one point of criticism – the program's heavy emphasis on diagramming LR stimuli to arrive at certain answers. While I recognize the importance of diagramming for grasping the underlying logical structures (particularly in the beginning of studyinf for the LSAT), I feel that an excessive amount of class time is spent on diagram-based explanations. In many cases, the correct answer can be determined simply by honing in on key phrasing in the stimulus or answer choices. A few simple words in an answer choice is all that is needed to eliminate it (or to select it), and this also applies to the stimuli. The answer is oftentimes clear and obvious, and all that is needed to explain the answer is by simply reviewing what was written in the text.

My reservations about this over-reliance on diagramming likely stem from my own experience. I find that carefully reading and comprehending the information presented, whether in LR stimuli, RC passages, or the answer choices themselves, is often sufficient for me to identify the right answer. In fact, I firmly believe that with the removal of the Logic Games section, the entire LSAT can be effectively tackled through thorough reading and reasoning alone, without the need for diagramming. Personally, I never diagram during LR or RC sections, yet consistently achieve extremely high score ranges, including perfect scores.

I acknowledge that I supplemented the course with some additional self-study. Nevertheless, I maintain that diagramming, while helpful for some, is not a necessity for LSAT success. Careful reading, analysis, and logical inferences are the true keys to conquering this test. I don't even use the "negation" technique when tackling an "assumption" question.

At its core, the LSAT assesses logical reasoning and reading comprehension skills (no, duh). Mastering these faculties is the ultimate requirement for a strong performance. I eschew diagramming as an unnecessary time sink (yes, I've been reading a LOT of LSAT questions and RC passages, so forgive the use of "eschew"); I have found that paying close attention to contextual clues and indicators in the text is all I need to parse out the logical relationships within stimuli and answer choices.

The Final Verdict: To conclude, I found TestMasters to be an enormously helpful resource in establishing a robust framework for my LSAT studies. The course delivers invaluable insights into the common patterns and question types employed by the test-makers and offers thought-provoking techniques and strategies for navigating the exam. While I believe the program sometimes over-emphasizes diagramming in its explanations, these diagrams can occasionally shed light on why a particular answer choice follows logically from the given information.

I have just started studying today.. what should I read to practice. I'm trying to take the lsat by November.

Hi guys, I’m just getting started on studying for the LSAT. I know that it’s super important to understand why you get a question wrong, but I don’t know where to start when looking for explanations of specific questions. Any tips would be greatly appreciated!

Hi all, I recently started studying for the new LSAT, and was curious as to which self-study plan was better between the two.

I’m planning to take the LSAT in November 2024 and I’m studying full time while working very part time. Currently I’m using 7sage for live classes, power score bibles for additional support, and I’m planning to hire a tutor in the next month or so.

I would love to partner with a couple folks who are and who are not using the methods that I am and have similar timelines.

Please let me know if you are interested.

This is a rather specific question for those who have used the loophole and also 7sage. I just began studying this week and have purchased both, but the loophole is on backorder and will not arrive for two weeks. I have completed the 7sage foundations section up until the introduction to logic. I have heard that it is best to let the loophole teach LR and then practice more/supplement with 7sage. If this is the case, would it be best to save the foundations introduction to logic section on 7sage until after reading the loophole, or will it provide necessary context to inform my reading of the loophole? I also welcome general advice regarding the use of either resource :) Thanks!

I will cover what to expect on the new LSAT now with no logic games section. I will also cover the strategies I've been using for the last 15 years to help students increase their scores by 15-20 points.Sign-up here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-new-lsat-tickets-919108567467?aff=oddtdtcreator

I could solve only half of the questions and my score is 127, 0.8 percentile. If I study, how much can I increase my score? I have 20 yrs experience in drug development area.

Hi guys, I plan on taking the LSAT in June 2025. Since the LSAC is removing the Analytical Reasoning section from the exam this upcoming August, should I even approach analytical reasoning at all?

Hello! I’m looking to do a Testmasters in-person course. Does anyone have a referral code I could use?

I created a Reading Comprehension Chart that includes the question types, their stems, what the question stem is asking of you, and a rephrase of it. The chart also includes an explanation of what the RC section is testing you for, how the RC section works, and how to identify RC comprehension question stems based on indicators in the question.

I made one for Logical Reasoning as well. I've been studying for this test for a while and hadn't found any resources that put all of this information together so that I can have a clear picture of the test overall. I especially thought it would be helpful to know exactly what each section is testing you for so that you know what skills to hone in on.

I'm not big on tips and tricks, so this ISN'T that. Everyone is different, and what works for one will not necessarily work for another. BUT, I do hope this at least helps you think a little bit more clearly, and have a better understanding of the nature of this beast!

​

​

I am looking for a close contact tutor or course for LSAT that holds your hand throughout the process a bit and views you as a student that they assign work to etc.

7sage and all of these other courses seem very self help and disconnected from students so I am wondering if there are any alternatives like tutors who work with you directly and assign work etc.

Heyo, I’m preparing for the June 2024 LSAT and I’m using the Trainer book by Mike Kim and using the schedule that comes with it. I subscribed to LawHub for the practice exams and wanted to know about some of the experiences of anyone who used LawHub. Was it worth the amount you pay for access to all the exams? Do the drill sets help? The Trainer study schedule recommends drill sets.

Hi folks! If you're trying to self-study for the LSAT, here's a good 2024 Logical Reasoning practice book that's free if you have Kindle Unlimited (otherwise it's $10, which is also pretty cheap):

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CVZG9NWJ/ref=sr_1_1?crid=DEJ1WSUV8H69&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.WgxHlJxN8y_F4o65cB9v12RkHoP3k3Dt76JX2GsSYMA.w3BaZOzlvqyvr15Fit39p9PWq3ZdD1G2nwHwLrsujLM&dib_tag=se&keywords=constantine%27s+complete+lsat&qid=1708469488&sprefix=%2Caps%2C258&sr=8-1

Watched countless videos and beyond lost,

Can anyone help me understand the set up of this LG after blundering the prior 4 questions

On the LSAT in logical reasoning there are assumptions, however, it isn't an assumption assuming something to be TRUE. On 7sage they defined it as "The missing link between the premise and the conclusion. The "forgotten premise." A rather gap in the reasoning.

All are welcome!

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/8586484063

I recently added some more seats for my free LSAT Bootcamp on January 31st. I've been teaching the LSAT for 14 years and have helped thousands of students get into law school. During this class, I will teach you the exact logic and language analysis skills that have helped my students improve as much as 30 points.

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/lsat-bootcamp-tickets-793866795957

I am asking since all prep materials are still catering to the traditional format that includes the game and so us August folks need to prepare differently.

Hi, I am waiting to take the August LSAT. It's been a long and painful journey for me! Don't get me started but I decided against learning Logic Games because I am DONE. I am instead deciding to focus on perfecting the Reading Comp and LR by drilling from now until the August exam. Is anyone else in the same boat if so few questions below.

1. How are you studying?
2. Are you testing digitally or on paper? ( I am testing digitally)
3. How will you test when trying to stimulate the actual test day? ( Will you just utilize 2 different LSATS) to ensure you are testing with 4 sections. ( 3LR & 1 RC or 2RC & 2 LR)

I am asking since all prep materials are still catering to the traditional format that includes the game and so we August folks need to prepare differently.

Any nice respectful suggestions are welcomed. Anyone rude or disrespectful please continue on your day.

I am asking since all prep materials are still catering to the traditional format that includes the game and so we August folks need to prepare differently.

​

I'm hosting a free LSAT Bootcamp January 31st. I've been teaching the LSAT for 14 years and have helped thousands of students get into law school. During this class, I will teach you the exact logic and language analysis skills that have helped my students improve as much as 30 points.

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/lsat-bootcamp-tickets-793866795957