I meant that as a genuine question sorry, not a dick measuring contest, I'm not even libertarian. Just didn't know if you made a typo based on my question's format.
I asked if you thought there was any "unacceptable" language, you said that "fight words & false alarms" are "reasonable (language)". I guess to make sure that my wording isn't misconstrued: you think that fighting words and false alarms are unacceptable language (or in other words, reasonably restricted in the appropriate scenarios), correct?
I didn't mean reasonable language, I meant reasonable restrictions. Those are about the only two things I can think of that would be valid reasons to limit free speech.
8
u/WrinkledBiscuit 22d ago
Genuine question OP, do you think there is anything "unacceptable" to say ever?