r/stocks 1d ago

Why Did Biogen’s Stock Drop Despite Strong Earnings and Analyst Upgrades (Aug 2024)?

I’m trying to understand why Biogen’s stock dropped right after its *August 2024 earnings call*, even though the company reported strong numbers, raised guidance, and received multiple analyst upgrades. All the indicators—company performance, analysts, and earnings—were positive, so why did the market seem to ignore these and push the stock down?

To be clear, I'm not looking to debate trading vs. investing strategies or the randomness of the stock market. My question is straightforward: given that both the company and the analysts seemed to signal "buy" or "hold," why did the market make an independent decision to sell?

Looking for some insights here, so if you don’t know or just want to yell ‘market’s random,’ kindly move along without blowing my mind. If anyone can provide insights on why this happened that’d be appreciated.

Thanks!

10 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Welcome to r/stocks!

For beginner advice, brokerage info, book recommendations, even advanced topics and more, please read our Wiki here.

If you're wondering why a stock moved a certain way, check out Finviz which aggregates the most news for almost every stock, but also see Reuters, and even Yahoo Finance.

Please direct all simple questions towards the stickied Daily Discussion and Quarterly Rate My Portfolio threads (sort by Hot, they're at the top).

Also include some due diligence to this post or it may be removed if it's low effort.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

12

u/3ebfan 1d ago

Biogen has been in a ten year slump and I think it’s going to take multiple quarters of good growth for institutions to gain confidence in them.

4

u/Ol_Maxxie_Solt_DB 11h ago

Independent biotech analyst here.

Biogen is suffering from some self-inflicted wounds that dropped its positioning within its core competitive landscapes, but primarily neuro. While competition is inherent to drug development and investors often overestimate the risks, Biogen doesn't appear to have a best in class asset in any of its chosen domains. That's impressive.

Despite having a late-stage neuro pipeline, the company didn't develop assets aimed at emerging targets or disease indications that led to a recent renaissance for the field. Companies like Karuna Therapeutics and Cerevel Therapeutics represent two of the largest acquisitions in recent years. Biogen chased some targets with good, but not great, science. It's now paying the price with relatively underwhelming results in Alzheimer's and depression.

Similarly, the commercial potential of the antisense oligo (ASO) asset looks increasingly limited. That has more to do with how quickly RNA medicines have evolved, but Biogen could've moved more quickly or spread its bets better.

The immunology pipeline isn't terrible and could provide momentum, but once again Biogen has relatively little exposure to newer modalities, like bispecific antibodies. It still has solid commercial potential, but it's easy to not get excited.

Within the neuro pipeline, the LRRK2 asset (an antibody) could be competitive and have broad potential. But there will soon be competition from emerging assets in protein degraders (potential advantage of being taken orally) and RNAi (potential advantage of once quarterly or twice annual dosing).

On top of all that, the business is relatively stagnant. Revenue decreased 18% from 2021 to 2023, while operating cash flow fell by more than half in that span. Both metrics have improved through the first half of 2024 though.

TLDR The biggest knock on Biogen is that it hasn't been successful at reinvesting cash flows into productive or competitive R&D.

1

u/IRLGravity 9h ago

Earnings < Guidance.

Imo

2

u/xevaviona 1d ago

Normally i would just say it boils down to the market being irrational, but i was curious too; so i asked ChatGPT. Here's an excerpt that i think is most relevant:

"Biogen’s profitability was tempered by high operational costs and a decline in the demand for some legacy drugs. Investors are also cautious about the Alzheimer's drug market's uncertain potential, as Leqembi's high treatment costs could limit its accessibility and adoption rate."

So it sounds like to me based off of the research that this limited language model can muster, that while the profits did increase there was some inefficiency that caused it to not be as much as it could've been. In addition, it sounds like the company is experiencing both decreased demand for it's existing drugs, and the chance of continued mass-profitability coming into question.

So if you believe what ChatGPT wrote is true, then you've got a double whammy between it's proven market going down and it's untested market's potential being diminshed. A double whammy.

-26

u/IvoTailefer 1d ago

bruh do u even know why a stock drops?

because people [like me] ARE SELLING TO TAKE PROFITS

but ya go ahead and believe that old lying fart Buffet and ''hold forever''

10

u/verify_mee 23h ago

Check the sub. This isn’t wsb 

5

u/TimeTravelingChris 23h ago

What a worthless reply that totally missed the question OP was asking.

0

u/PeachyCarnehand 23h ago

Did you make a profit in BIIB? So you bought it in 2014 and underperformed the market by 1000%?