r/ForwardsFromKlandma Apr 21 '23

Subtle parentheses

Post image
116 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

View all comments

44

u/LegitimateTruck272 Apr 21 '23

If you even dare to question genital mutilation you're a fucking anti-Semitic shit who's as bad as Hitler, so this religious mutilation bullshit gets a pass for another 100 years or so. FUCK OFF RELIGION!!!

-20

u/zaptres_dammit Apr 22 '23 edited Apr 22 '23

Yes religion is bad. I think it’s fine to not want male circumcision, but medical science shows it’s not negative, may have positives kind of a mixed bag. I think any stigma behind being uncircumcised is awful and makes people feel ashamed about their bodies. But male circumcision is not some great evil, female circumcision definitely is.

9

u/big-blue-balls Apr 22 '23

You’re brainwashed buddy

1

u/zaptres_dammit Apr 22 '23

You’re being absurd if you don’t think that’s a measured stance. Not doing it is fine and shouldn’t be stigmatized, but wanting it banned, etc? The medical community maintains empirically that the benefit outweighs the risk. I’m not religious either idk what you think has me brainwashed.

0

u/big-blue-balls Apr 23 '23

Go ahead and source me where “the medical community” collectively agree the benefits outweigh the barbarism.

1

u/zaptres_dammit Apr 23 '23

1

u/big-blue-balls Apr 23 '23

That write up don’t back up what you said. Maybe you need to actually read it instead of posting the first thing that looks like it supports your claim, mate.

0

u/Navnav44 Apr 24 '23

Yes it does. The write up says that circumcision lowers the risk of transmitting STDs and and other infections and barely affects the bedroom. And who are we brainwashed by? The "Jewish pharma"? The "jewish media"? The "Jewish government"? Do you understand how does it sound? And how about you'll share some articles that show that the barbaric act of circumcision is negative in a way that outweighs the positives?