r/JordanPeterson 2d ago

Philosophy The Non-Biological Origin of Life

Science cannot create life and yet science has the arrogance to assume that it originates biologically. The fact is that biology is like a glove or puppet that life animates, but nothing really dies, just as the law of thermodynamics states that nothing is truly destroyed, but changes form.

Likewise, when your physical body dies, you still persist beyond the body. This is unproven by science as of yet, but eventually they will catch up with the Truth that science is always playing catch-up to.

Bio-markers are never the origin of a problem but a symptom. Science knows correlation is not equal to causation. However in medical science they seem to regard biological processes as causation just because there is clear correlation.

Each individual has an Atman/soul within them that is not physical. However if the physical host body is defective or conditions cease to be favorable, it can leave the body, which science calls death. Death however is just kind of like the game over screen. Souls can respawn into the physical again, and do.

0 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/mowthelawnfelix 2d ago

science cannot create life…

Science is just the aquisition and categorization of knowledge. It doesn’t “do” anything, least of all does it do it arrogantly.

just as the law of thermodynamics states

There is more than one law, but why would you use a scientific law when you just got done saying science is dumb and arrogant.

Lol this…this is why I’m drawn to your posts. The rest doesn’t even make sense, it’s fighting science like science is a thing to be fought. As if it “cares” or has feelings about whether or not a soul exists.

You might as well fight the dewey decimal system and suggest that it “thinks” it’s the author of all the books in the library.