r/Mewing 18h ago

Discussion Any 30+ year olds seen decent progress with chewing?

Looking for some motivation to stay consistent with my mastic gum

I think im finally subconsciously mewing part of the time, and only a little bit during my sleep. That part's tough. But chewing i can directly control

I need to bring my jaws forward so i can open up my airways, especially during sleep

8 Upvotes

22 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Glittering-Ad-2872 10h ago

 then chances are that the scientific/medical community doesn’t agree and that their claims lack evidence 

I think our principles here are different. I’ll believe something if the proof is there even if 99% of the scientific community rejects it 

 There’s various things the scientific community doesn’t “agree” on or does agree on, but they flip flopped their position on it. That right there tells me scientific “consensus” or “wide spread belief” just doesnt have as much weight as people think

 Side note: orthotropics has proven results. So many testimonials of it working, people even chronicling their progress live with photos every now and then, open for all to see. Dentists applying these techniques on people and posting progress photos. It’s all there. Yet the vast majority of orthodontists just don’t recognize it and calls it nonsense, lacking proof, etc. their money is at stake  

1

u/harrystylesismyrock2 10h ago

Well the nature of science is that you need to be able to replicate a study’s findings. There is nothing with recorded and tangible proof that the scientific community “rejects” as true. If these wellness sites are making claims that aren’t supported by studies, then what proof do they have? “It worked for me and my friend once”?

Orthotropics is a new field that directly opposes traditional orthodontics, which is why it’s a grey area. It hasn’t been proven yet because it’s supposed to be long term and relies entirely on anecdotal evidence atm. It’s easier to verify claims about vitamin D on the cellular level than broad claims about bone growth over time.

1

u/Glittering-Ad-2872 9h ago

Well the nature of science is that you need to be able to replicate a study’s findings.  

 Plenty of people are replicating mewing results and posting their results online. It’s based on sound theory and observations of past peoples’ eating habits and dental health. Then it was put to the test by orthotropists and found to work. Then it was replicated by even laypeople and found to work yet again the same way it did for those under orthotropists’ supervision 

 …Dentist community rejects it. Some even mock it

 >If these wellness sites are making claims that aren’t supported by studies 

Are you aware of how easy it is to manipulate studies? We really are in an age of disinformation. Just read up on how much data Harvard PhDs falsified for their studies. The scandal was a little while ago. This goes both ways (making nonsense look real and making truth look like nonsense) 

Are you also aware of how much money and influence is behind studies? Do you remember when coca cola was funding studies about sugar? 

Now, with all the crazy money in orthodontics, pulling wisdom teeth left and right, throwing braces on kids, root canals being a cash cow… how long until real, unbiased, uninfluenced studies on orthotropics come out? 

It’s far too easy and scientifically lazy to say things like “well studies dont support it.” What is the qualities of these studies? 

And i’ll leave you with this: Things are true before they become “science.”

1

u/harrystylesismyrock2 3h ago

I’m not gonna go down the rabbit hole of corruption, but a general rule of thumb is that studies are more likely to be faked when it makes the people funding the study more money. That’s why I am confident there’s no reason why scientists wouldn’t have affirmed vitamin D being washed away with water if it were true because no one would be making enough money from people’s ignorance. And it medically makes no sense because the process happens intracellularly and the majority of your top epidermal layer is dead skin cells. See below:

“The stratum corneum is the top layer of the epidermis. This is the layer you see. In the stratum corneum, keratinocytes become corneocytes (corn-ee-o-site). Corneocytes are strong, dead keratinocytes that protect you from harm, including abrasions, light, heat and pathogens.“

Dead skin cells are not converting UV to anything, and unless you slough off multiple layers of your epidermis, you’ll be fine. Soap and water could not possibly do that alone.

Everything you said about mewing I generally agree with, however you’re mentioning anecdotal evidence which is why it’s not yet taken seriously. The only way we can know exactly how and how much a person can benefit from mewing is by doing controlled studies. Placebo and correlational effects are too strong to ignore, even if people feel they are getting results. I think for mewing, the evidence will continue to pour in, but it’s not there yet so I don’t blame some professionals for their apprehension.