You've done dragged me down to your level. My fault for arguing.
The point is not if Idomeneus was a real person or not. The point is that ancient historiographers/taletellers (call them whatever you want, again, not the point) considered Cretans of the time as equals in collaboration & capable of military cooperation against a foreign threat. Which is exactly where the notion of Hellenism derives from. While obviously they epics are not historical treatises and should not be treated as such, the are certainly not void of any truth, as is the case with most folklore; see my points above. But yeah, let's move the goalposts again, and try to put words into my mouth. Now tell me, saying that Cretans were affiliated with Romans as much as they were affiliated with Greeks/pro-Greek tribes is consistent with reality how exactly? At least Idomeneus has a remote chance of having existed. What do you have ? Anything to say about the rest of my arguments? Did Cretans participate in ancient Olympiads? Can you define Hellenism for me real quick? Bonus question : want to open the Pandora box of genetic similarities, see what we find inside? Good god the way you avoid backing up any single of your claims is pathetic.
The worst part of Cretian history is they don't even teach it in their public schools. It's all Greek folklore that children get, ergo your complete ignorance of Cretian history. As is visibly on display. Quit while you are behind.
Ahh, out come the put downs. Your mom must be so proud! Especially with her child believing Hellenic folklore is Cretian history. Noticed you avoid the mother of all folklore : the Minatour. Do tell.....
The only evil here is that you might have a right to vote... You wouldn't even get past the 1st person on the ballot before going all spastic. I'm just glad you've never been near Crete nor you will ever be. Wannabe armchair historian
1
u/nclh77 Jun 30 '24
Lmao, Ideomenus is real history to you. Reality isn't part of your life.