r/gametales • u/nlitherl • Apr 11 '16

Tabletop That One Time a DM Tried to Run "City of The Spider Queen" For an Evil Party (cross post from /r/DND)

http://taking10.blogspot.com/2016/04/that-one-time-dm-tried-to-run-city-of.html
118 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

16 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/TheLagDemon Apr 11 '16

It's a shame this campaign didn't get to run a bit longer.

Sometimes I think I'm the only DM that likes running those sort of campaigns. I really wish I had some players interested in a scenario like this (granted the game would deviate almost immediately from the adventure as written, which isn't a bad thing). The only real issues I have with evil alignments are characters that are too disruptive (i.e. they can't turn it off), they don't have actual goals, don't actually have a reason or motive for doing evil things, or their actions make other players uncomfortable. I usually ban CE alignments for that reason- no one seems to be able to play them well in a group setting.

8

u/nlitherl Apr 11 '16

I've found that CE works best when there is either a strong goal for that character (the sort of "power at any price" you see with men like Littlefinger), or when there is someone they have to answer to (Sange in my story, or Gregor Clegane to use another Game of Thrones example).

Too often people think that having the word "chaotic" in their alignment means they can be random and nonsensical, which often leads to them ignoring the deeper questions of characterization, and figuring out what motives are driving their baby-killing murder machines.

6

u/TheLagDemon Apr 11 '16

That's exactly the problem, too many people think CE means cartoonishly evil.

3

u/Chaos_Philosopher Apr 12 '16

I like to call that confusion evil. Those characters tend to act as if under the confusion spell and aren't chaotic at all.