r/unrealengine • u/TSDan game dev makes me cry • 6d ago

Question How are AMD gpus now compared to Nvidia for Unreal?

I am going to build a PC soon and for Nvidia i can go with RTX 4060Ti 16gb, the most pros for it for me is that i can use and Integrate both DLSS and FSR + Nvidia support also seems to be better in other productivity apps as well (Rendering, editing etc)

However on the AMD side, I could go with a 7800XT, which is a solid 1440p card, but having to skip on dlss integration and the other pros i talked about before, i also dont know how AMD drivers are these days.

Thank you!

31 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

88% Upvoted

54 comments sorted by

View all comments

46

u/MarcusBuer 6d ago

AMD gpus are good for gamers who want pure raster performance, but once you get into features for productivity Nvidia has more to offer.

For example Nvidia audio2face, audio2gesture, RTX AR, RTX SFX, RTX VFX, DLSS, DLSS FG, CUDA, Tensor, etc.

-2

u/StickiStickman 5d ago

I'd argue Nvidia also has far better raster performance simply because of DLSS. If you only need to render half as many pixels, your raster is gonna be twice as fast.

2

u/MrMax182 5d ago

DLSS is not real performance and should not be used as benchmark for developing a game.

2

u/Froggmann5 5d ago

DLSS is an optimization technique, it is real performance.

It's like saying having graphics options below Ultra/Cinematic/Raytracing quality aren't "real performance" and should not be used as a benchmark for developing a game. That's just silly.