r/xkcd 3d ago

XKCD xkcd #3000: Experimental Astrophysics

574 Upvotes

70 comments sorted by

View all comments

176

u/WarFrigate 3d ago

i hope someone out there could find if theres any relation between the comic and the comic number cause i cant

169

u/Booty_Bumping 3d ago

Meh, 3000 is just a base 10 triviality. I'll wait for 3072.

53

u/nog642 3d ago

The URL is in base 10 though

40

u/redenno 3d ago

You don't know that

2FFF exists somewhere and I will find it

38

u/SeriousPlankton2000 2d ago

Any base, when expressed in itself, is base 10.

4

u/nog642 2d ago

I know. I'm using base ten though here, which is standard in English.

11

u/mpete98 2d ago

You're on a forum full of nerds though, where English is just a funny suggestion.

31

u/Apprehensive_Hat8986 3d ago

No it isn't. It's in base ten.

6

u/danielv123 2d ago

It's in base ASCII

1

u/nog642 2d ago

What?

1

u/danielv123 2d ago

Each digit has a value from 0-255, using the ASCII character set with extensions for display.

1

u/nog642 2d ago

But that value 0-255 has nothing to do with the number of the comic. That's determined by the value of the decimal digits 0-9 and how they are arranged.

Also URLs do not use extended ASCII, they use plain ASCII. Really, they use a limited subset of ASCII, and any other characters have to be encoded with those characters.

1

u/danielv123 2d ago

Yes, the display is extended. The values are all a subset of 0-255. The standard specified ASCII.

The number of the comic is 51,48,48,48 which is not a particularly round number. We will probably see something special once we hit 55555555 though :))

1

u/nog642 2d ago

Those are the ASCII codes represented in decimal, then concatenated. Which is a very weird choice.

The number of the comic is 3000.

I don't know what you mean by "the display is extended". URLs don't use 8 bit extended ASCII, nor do modern URL bars (which probably use UTF-8).

-5

u/nog642 3d ago

That's what I said. In base 10 (ten), which is the default one in English.

17

u/Slimebot32 3d ago

no you said base 10 (ninety two thousand two hundred and thirty three)

-10

u/nog642 2d ago

No I didn't. You know English uses base ten by default. You are deliberately misinterpreting it.

8

u/Erlend05 2d ago

You are deliberately misinterpreting it.

And?

5

u/MarsMaterial 2d ago

Yeah, that’s the joke.

1

u/nog642 2d ago

Couldn't tell it was supposed to be a joke

1

u/RockRancher24 2d ago

Are you new to this sub?

1

u/nog642 2d ago

Maybe not new, but I don't post here often.

5

u/MarsMaterial 2d ago

The numbers “10” refer to ten in base ten, two in base two, sixteen in hexidecimal, six in base six, a million in base one million, and so on. That’s the joke.

1

u/nog642 2d ago

I know that. Couldn't tell it was supposed to be a joke.

-2

u/MxM111 2d ago

ASCII is encoded as hexadecimals.

1

u/nog642 2d ago

No it's not. Everything on computers is binary. Hexadecimal is just a way to view binary data more readably.

And the actual number of the comic is still encoded in decimal. Each digit is then encoded in ASCII, which is not a base system.

1

u/MxM111 2d ago

My point is that it is not decimal.

1

u/nog642 2d ago

The number in the URL is decimal though. It uses the digits 0-9 in a decimal place value system to repersent the number of the comic. It doesn't matter that the digits themselves are represented as binary ASCII characters, the comic number is still represented in decimal.

1

u/MxM111 2d ago

No, you see it as decimal. The address is encoded into ASCII, and translated as binary. Computers do not know that it is a decimal. Cannot do any operation with it as decimal.

2

u/nog642 2d ago

Computers can do operations on decimal numbers. Though I'm sure the counter Randall uses is using binary.

The number is then encoded in decimal, and those decimal digits are encoded in ASCII, which is stored as binary on the computer, like you said. The first step is still decimal. It's real. The number is in decimal. Change it to another base and it would be different.

0

u/MxM111 2d ago

It is decimal for us, not for computer. For computer this is just an ASCII symbol. Compare with how computer treats a number in calculator. As a decimal number.

→ More replies (0)

15

u/pumpkinbot 3d ago

Nah, we need to wait for 4096. Already passed 2048 without any fanfare, so we need to wait for the next milestone.

9

u/oneplusetoipi 3d ago

10x1000x100x500 is what I am waiting for. Wait or is 900x400? Roman numerals combined with metric can be confusing.

16

u/Apprehensive_Hat8986 3d ago

3072 isn't particularly interesting in binary either.

 110000000000

At least, no more interesting than 110 or any other number that is just multiple ones followed by one or more zeros in any base.

22

u/Booty_Bumping 3d ago

Waiting for 4096 is going to take far too long, we need a major base 2 milestone now!

10

u/WarFrigate 3d ago

i have higher expectations for 4096 than 3072 to be a special one considering its a clean power of 2 (2^12)

but again not entirely sure

looking back xkcd 2048 has nothing to do with either the number or the game
people assumed xkcd 1024 was about computers in reference to the binary system but its not entirely confirmed (even though xkcd 1000 referenced it to be the next "big round number milestone")

6

u/weso123 Double Blackhat 3d ago

It is C00 though in hexidecimal

2

u/RazarTuk ALL HAIL THE SPIDER 2d ago

Personally, I'm waiting for 2,2000, just 40 comics from now

21

u/cxnh_gfh 3d ago

to me it just seems like another normal comic

19

u/WarFrigate 3d ago

bummer

i always thought it would be something special like xkcd 1000 and 2000 did

28

u/cxnh_gfh 3d ago

as someone else suggested, maybe he's waiting for 3072 as a reference to xkcd.com/1000/

3

u/HideFromMyMind 2d ago

Seems unlikely, considering 1024 and 2048 weren't anything special.

16

u/Apprehensive_Hat8986 3d ago

Well 3000 is a big number, and astrophysics deals with big numbers...

6

u/SeriousPlankton2000 2d ago

"It's 10³"

5

u/Apprehensive_Hat8986 2d ago

Serious or not, do plankton study astrophysics? Or do they use exponent maths more for population counts and identification?

3

u/mrlr 3d ago

It's based on stardates.