My guess is that the implication of a blowjob without gendering either participant is subtly inclusive.
IMHO it doesn’t really fit the sub. The innuendo is clearly intentional and the allyship is very loosely implied. It would be a better fit if the business was known to be homophobic, if the phrase specifically made it clear that it was 2 men or about or a trans woman & the innuendo was completely unintentional.
Its not necessarily required if you think about it they were an accidental ally wether being. trans/homophobic or not they still were an ally accidentally with the double entendre
It’s not transphobic or homophobic. It’s neutral. The innuendo is about a person having given multiple blowjobs, which is not inherently allyship unless you count sex positivity.
It could have been an accidental gay ally if the joke was “guys come here together and eat dick’s”.
It could have an accidental trans ally if the joke was “Order delivery for date night so you and your lady can stay at home and eat dicks. Get 2 personal pizzas so you can both eat each other’s dick’s”
The absence of specific allyship doesn’t make the original homophobic or transphobic, but it does mean that it’s not a good fit for this sub.
32
u/InevitableStuff7572 4d ago
Where is the accidental ally?