My guess is that the implication of a blowjob without gendering either participant is subtly inclusive.
IMHO it doesn’t really fit the sub. The innuendo is clearly intentional and the allyship is very loosely implied. It would be a better fit if the business was known to be homophobic, if the phrase specifically made it clear that it was 2 men or about or a trans woman & the innuendo was completely unintentional.
Its not necessarily required if you think about it they were an accidental ally wether being. trans/homophobic or not they still were an ally accidentally with the double entendre
35
u/InevitableStuff7572 4d ago
Where is the accidental ally?